Tesla CEO Musk and X CEO Yaccarino respond to bombshell report on far-left NGO tactics

• Asra Nomani’s report reveals 24 far-left NGOs—with $124M+ in combined annual revenue—are behind the coordinated “Tesla Takedown” protests, alleging dark money funding and partisan ties to the Democratic Party.
• Elon Musk and X CEO Linda Yaccarino expressed shock, with Musk questioning protest funding. The report gained 7M+ views on X and may be under DOJ review amid domestic terrorism probes.
• Protests involved vehicle-ramming attacks and arson (e.g., Molotov cocktails), with three suspects already indicted by the DOJ for targeting Tesla property.
• Groups like Indivisible and Democratic Socialists of America used platforms like ActionNetwork to organize protests, leveraging tax-deductible status despite partisan activities.
• Experts argue state laws (not just federal) should prosecute these acts as racketeering, emphasizing accountability for orchestrated violence against Tesla.

A detailed report by former Wall Street Journal journalist Asra Nomani has shed new light on the far-left NGOs and their alleged involvement in the “Tesla Takedown” protest movement. The report, which has gained significant traction, has reached both Elon Musk and X CEO Linda Yaccarino, prompting them to express their shock and concern. The report, which details 24 organizations behind the protests, highlights a web of dark money and organized agitation that has fueled the movement.

The report’s impact

The report, which focuses on 24 far-left organizations, reveals that these protests are far from organic and are likely fueled by rent-a-protesters. Nomani’s investigative work, which has been shared widely, has garnered nearly 7 million views on X, a social media platform. The report reached Elon Musk, who responded with “interesting,” and Linda Yaccarino, who replied with a simple but telling “!!”

Musk’s Response:

“Who is funding and organizing all these paid protests?” – Elon Musk, quoting a recent Joe Rogan podcast.

The report has also likely ended up in the hands of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Doge Team, who are investigating the origins of these protests, as well as domestic terrorism attacks by far-left Democrats against Tesla vehicles, showrooms, service centers, and chargers.

The protests and their consequences

On Saturday, the “Tesla Takedown” movement, which was coordinated by far-left NGOs, failed to gain significant traction. However, the protests have been marred by incidents of violence, including a vehicle-ramming attack against a pro-Tesla supporter. These events have raised concerns about the potential for further violence and the broader implications for public safety.

Nomani’s findings:

• Twenty-four organizations, with combined annual revenues of at least $124 million, are behind the “Tesla Takedown” protests.
• One hundred percent of these organizations are aligned with the Democratic Party.
• Many of these groups enjoy tax-deductible status as 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations, despite their partisan activities.
• The protests are being organized through platforms like ActionNetwork and Mobilize, which are closely aligned with the Democratic Party.

The role of dark money

The report highlights the role of dark money in funding these protests. Organizations like Indivisible, Democratic Socialists of America, and The Disruption Project have been involved in organizing and funding the protests. The involvement of these groups, many of which are linked to billionaire donors, underscores the coordinated nature of the “Tesla Takedown.”

Yaccarino’s shock:

The list of NGOs involved in the “Tesla Takedown” is alarming. It shows a coordinated effort to undermine Tesla and its CEO, Elon Musk. – Linda Yaccarino, X CEO

The legal and political implications

The “Tesla Takedown” has raised serious legal and political questions. The DOJ has already indicted three suspects for destroying or attempting to destroy Tesla property. The charges include arson-related offenses, and the suspects are accused of using Molotov cocktails in the commission of their crimes.

While the DOJ has labeled these acts as domestic terrorism, legal experts suggest that state governments should also play a significant role in holding these individuals accountable. State laws may be more flexible in defining and prosecuting acts of terrorism and racketeering, making it easier to bring these perpetrators to justice.

Expert Analysis:

Federal terrorism law may not be the best tool to hold these individuals accountable. State governments should step in and enforce their own laws against the Tesla arsonists. – Legal Expert, Anonymous

Organized and orchestrated — not grassroots

The “Tesla Takedown” and the subsequent report by Asra Nomani have brought to light a complex web of far-left NGOs and their alleged involvement in organizing and funding protests. The incidents of violence and the potential for further unrest highlight the need for a concerted effort by both federal and state authorities to address these issues. As the investigation continues, the focus remains on holding the perpetrators accountable and ensuring the safety of Tesla employees, customers, and the broader public.

Sources include:

ZeroHedge.com

X.com

City-Journal.org